Supplier search
A buyer-specific search that documents candidates, evidence, unknowns and exclusion reasons.
Review service →Buyer-side service
Robot QC, FAT & Pre-shipment Inspection
“Factory tested” is not an acceptance plan. Robot identity, configuration, functions, interfaces and defects need traceable records.
Inputs
What we need from the buyer.
- Purchase specification
- Acceptance criteria
- Quantity and sampling plan
- Critical workflows and destination requirements
Process
How the work is structured.
- 01
Write a risk-based inspection plan
- 02
Confirm configuration and serial numbers
- 03
Run observable function and condition checks
- 04
Record photos, video, results and deviations
- 05
Coordinate correction, re-test and release recommendation
Written outputs
What you receive.
- Inspection/FAT protocol
- Unit identity list
- Evidence-linked result report
- Deviation and corrective-action log
- Release recommendation with limitations
Buyer questions
Frequently asked questions
How is the scope priced?
Pricing depends on the number of products or suppliers, depth of evidence, travel, third-party work and urgency. The scope and fee are agreed in writing before paid work begins.
Will supplier commissions affect the recommendation?
The commercial disclosure policy requires relevant commissions, referral payments or supplier relationships to be disclosed before a recommendation.
Can this service guarantee supplier performance?
No. It is designed to improve the quality of a decision and preserve evidence, not to guarantee future behavior or eliminate every risk.
Next step
Related sourcing work
Supplier verification
Review a robot supplier’s legal identity, commercial role, documents, capabilities and unresolved risks.
Review service →Technical comparison
Put competing robot models on a comparable basis and separate facts, assumptions and missing evidence.
Review service →